Thursday, October 27, 2005

Wherein Amanda talks about witchcraft, deception, trickery, striped socks, and other things that might have her burned/read out of meeting in 1700.



Yeah. Halloween.

It's been my favourite holiday for a long time. I am desperately bored with the history behind the whole thing, how it went from a Feast Vigil into Satan's playground, and I'm sure you are, too, so I won't go into that. I am intensely uninterested in that particular set of moral dilemmas.

It's enough to know that around the age of 8, Halloween in our house turned into All Saint's Day. I can't say I was thrilled. There are not very many Rainbow Brite Star Wars Polly Pocket Fairy Princess Carebear My Little Pony Saints in the catalog. But I still managed to work around the restrictions. I'd pour over Lives of the Saints, choosing mostly by the pictures, and by who had the best outfit. Sometimes we'd stretch the boundaries and label anyone that showed up in the bible (except Satan) fair game. I got to go as an Egyptian Queen, (the chick that found Moses), a queen, (St. Helena), a queen, (St. Elizabeth of Hungary),a grotesque burn victim (St. Lawrence of Rome), and a zombie..er...leper...er...St Lazarus. All scoffing aside, it was always a fun time, and it's probably why I can tell you the lifestory of many obscure saints.

As soon as I could, though, I trekked my way back to the evil door of Halloween. I've worked for three different costume shops. I have three professional books on stage makeup. One year I was paid $100 bucks to design the make-up for a low-budget horror film revolving around Demented Clowns. That was the same year I set up a little side business attaching those gross latex things to people's faces. Right now I am costume mistress at the Ballet Theatre. I'm the chick everyone comes to for help planning their costume for any costume event. Before I went plain, half my closet was devoted to "this will come in handy for someone's costume".

Oh yeah.

I went plain.

I'm still dressing up for Halloween. I'm going to be a DooWop Vampire. Yes. I am.

Last night I was discussing Halloween costumes with Rachel. I noticed Jeff looking utterly ambivalent, but I tried to ignore him. Later, we walked the dog.


"I am a frivolous beast." I declared.

"What? Why do you say that?"

"I just am."

"????"

I explained that pretty much everything I like most is "pointless" and does not "further the glory of God". It's true. I like brightly coloured underpants. And tutus and pointe shoes. Also useless miniature figurines like the ones that come in Monopoly. I like movie musicals and muppets. I like theatre and opera and sketch TV. I'm not crazy about the Carebears any more but I sure do like Smurfs. I eat gummi bears from Germany. I like ultra-amoral back-and-white French New Wave art films. My favourite t-shirt of all time was from Old Navy and it was 100% rainbow striped. I enjoy eating peppermint flavoured lifesavers by the dozen. Once I was a ren-faire dweeb. I enjoy reading websites about cryptozoology, and I watch shows on The Discovery Channel like "The Half Ton Man" and "I Am My Own Twin". I eat Sugar Daddy lollipops. I miss fishnet stockings in several colours and getting my picture taken in fours in the pub photo booth. I like scotch and I even sometimes drink "Bitch Beer". I read Science Fiction and all kinds of novels, and I adore poetry. I giggle when people teach me a new obscenity and practice it to myself in the mirror. I've always wanted to play paintball, just once. I like Bollywood. Sequins are fun. I still read the American Girl Catalog. I was happiest with my hair when my hair was cut like Ringo's and dyed a nutty auburn. I like brightness and shininess and things that are red. Especially if all those three qualities are found in a shoe. I love blankets and wasting time lying in bed. Also, I like kittens. Puppies. Rabbits.

And I love, love, love to dress up.

"How," Jeff asked "can you be plain and celebrate Halloween?"

"It's...it's...it's play." I said.

We had a long and fairly thoughtful conversation. Jeff came up with a few good answers to his question, though he said he still couldn't see how it was to the glory of God. But all I could think was, "It's play! I'm still allowed to play, dammnit, grey socks, black shoes, and white underpants notwithstanding."

(I don't really wear white underpants.)

And I felt something very like panic rising up in me. Also something very much like pouting. I felt horrible. Again and again I have given up things that I loved because I couldn't see how they were in service to God. Like that fateful time I gave up the opportunity to get my BFA in acting and last minute threw myself into a religious school I knew nothing about, all because it seemed somehow likelier to please God.

I said something to the effect of all this to Jeff, and he asked:

"Well, did you ever think that maybe a life of monasticism and plainness is not for you?"

It felt like a slap in the face, though I knew it was said in love. Without thinking, I reacted with a flash of self-hatred.

"It's not meant for my corrupt fleshy bits. It's meant for my good bits. My saintly bits. And for now the crappy frivolous beasty bits out-number the rest. Okay?"

I backslid right into a steaming pile of Original Sin, an idea that has always curdled in my soul. A feeling that I'm somehow tainted, wrong, off. That I must do violence to myself, cutting off my hand or eye. That there are parts of me that are rotten and putrid and that must be stripped away, pruned, weeded, burned. Choose your illustration.

As I stewed in these thoughts, I began to wonder, "Well, what is this will of God I am always supposed to be sacrificing things to? How does this or that bit of denial "Glorify Him" more? What does God want? What Glorifies God?"

Well, the answer's pretty familiar. We were created to love. We were created perfectly to love. We are created in the image of the Lover. That's what we are, that's what we're here for. In the absence of any other evidence, with the presence of a thousand "X-factors", this is the only Will of God we know or have any way of knowing. Love is the glory of God. And if we're created in Love, by Love, and to Love, then the only things that need to be stripped away are the things that are not us, that are foreign to us, that have been added on after the fact. Anything that comes between us and our created ability to love has got to go. God requires from us authenticity....to be our true, created selves--the selves that are perfectly tuned for Loving.

Jeff was talking about the fundemental difference between Simplicity and Plainness. From what I gathered it had to do with Plainness being a sign of a religious witness/committment. To dress for the glory of God.

As I've been struggling with my plainness in the past few months, I've found this division difficult. I went plain because I didn't want to be the rich young man who went away sad. I had several issues at hand...I felt that I used fancy clothes as a way to be other than my Authentic self...the self who was created to Love. I also felt that consumption and materialism have real, measurable effects on the world around me. Abusing my fellow creatures, who labour in sweatshops, and abusing my home the earth, which staggers under the weight of landfills and poison, is not Loving.

But the grey, and the long skirts, and the kerchief?

I don't know. In the beginning I wanted them to connect me to Quakerism in some sort of tangible ways. I wanted a feeling of kinship with the long-dead Friends who taught me in their books. I also wanted a feeling of togetherness with the plain people I ran into online, who all seemed to think like me. These people, I felt, called out to my more authentic self, and I wanted to honour that, to make myself as palpably a part of that as I could.

I have found that greatly restricting my wardrobe has led to much less consumerisim on my part. The ideas about clothes have spread to other areas of consumption. Freeing myself from every-day makeup was a revelation. I didn't feel that I had to "fix" myself so much anymore to be ready for people to see me. Not spending $40 to $120 (yes.) dollars on haircuts every two months was another important step. I can't live like that when the world is starving and call myself a Lover of God.

I have found that the grey, the long skirts, and the kerchief do often help me to "act holier". I move more cautiously and gently through space, and I feel a bit more meek. I never flirt with counter-help or grin at someone across the subway when I am in a long black dress the way I might in a cute pair of cords. I don't shoot whiskey in a bar with my head covered. I think a lot about "what kind of image I am giving?" when I look "holy". And this is, I think, for the better.

If the grey makes me more loving, I'll keep wearing it. But I'm not sure if I am more loving in grey or in a pair of rainbow-striped kneesocks. I'd hope that as long as neither the grey nor the rainbow was made in a sweatshop, and the rainbow kneesocks were not a sign of me trying to be other than I am, then I'd be equally loving in both.

Am I called to a life of monasticism and plainness? I don't know. I'm called to life of love and authenticity. Every choice I make, from clothes up, should reflect and further those ends. Because those ends are the only Will of God I am likely to ever know. I can't claim to know what God's fashion sense is. I don't know if that puts my clothing/practice into the "plain" corral. To be honest, I'm not sure that that particular tag is so important to me anymore.

Whatever happens with all of the above, is authentic of me to play, and dress up. Play and imagination and fantasy are a large part of who I am.

I will have it be known that have never been less loving when I was wearing fangs.

25 comments:

Genuine Lustre said...

Amanda - Halloween was one of my favorite days as a child. I still love any occasion to dress up. This has morphed into my adult interest in "past dressing," and sewing clothes from other eras.
I can really identify with this post. I was thinking of writing somethingn similar because yesterday I had some time to myself while my kids were gone and I'm ashamed to say that I went out and bought a Vogue Magazine. My inner girly-girl likes to smell the perfume ads and read about people who live in giant English estate houses. Go figure!

Soulknitting said...

I think 'playing' is important for soul developemnt. Love, laughter, giggles, dressing up for Halloween, etc. only make God smile. Animals, flowers and the clouds play. And are 'dressed' in many colors. For various reasons. I don't think dressing up for halowween makes you 'unclean' for the the rest of the year.

Rosemary said...

Ooh, I liked this post.

Plain-ness . . . and love . . . and being yourself (ties to that big post on sin I keep meaning to make).

Mm, in some ways trying to do the plain thing is pretty easy for me. My favorite colors to wear are (honestly!) grey, brown, and a drab green, and I just eliminated almost everything from my wardrobe that wasn't. Then I started getting rid of everything tight and/or revealing (I still have that one nice, brown, low-cut, fitted tank top . . . ) Letting go of patterned things is still going on. I did get rid of everything (save two college shirts) with logos or big emblems. There's no way on this good earth that I'd ever stop wearing pants, so I didn't. God made me a tomboy, and He can just live with it. ;-) I resolved not to buy anything except second-hand (might have to bend to get a pair of Carhartts . . . GAH I want some of those!) Giving up jewelry was harder, but I did it. It just seemed right. I never wore makeup anyway. I never shaved, either, and I was growing out my hair anyway, so I decided to stop cutting it at all.

I still don't look distinctively Plain, and I don't think I ever will. But my whole point in that transition was to dress Simply, more than Plainly. Part of reducing Stuff in all areas of my life. A way to make myself more humble, and divorced from worldliness.

And yet . . . a couple of days ago I was running errands down town. I was looking very Plain. I was dressed in an ankle-length, very full wool skirt, and stockings and plain shoes (the ones that replaced SIX pairs of other shoes I got rid of during my Plain transition) and a plain wool sweater on top and over everything my drab wool ex-army jacket and my fedora (okay, the fedora wasn't very Plain at all. I LOVE my fedora). Anyway, I was strolling along Canal Street, feeling right out of a Film Noir, peeking glimpses of myself in all the shop windows. I felt like a 1940's era nurse borrowing her boyfriends coat and wandering downtown. Then it started to snow. I felt picturesque all day, like that scene at the end of Cold Mountain, almost.

Dressing plain keeps me humble, my ass.

Anyway, my point being, Plain is what you make of it. Whatever can serve as a reminder of God, I guess, to you and to others. And I think you can do that in rainbow-striped knee socks if you want to. :-)

Kate said...

Ooh ohh....you've inspired me to write up my thoughts on original sin. Soon to appear on a weblog near you.

Anyways, I would wager that you're probably not called to monastic plainness. Heck, I always thought it was a pity you went to Ave rather than pursue artsy fartsy acting school (but selfish me, I'm glad you came to MI and I met you). God didn't create you so that you could become less than you are, or deny the talents he has given you, or cease to take joy in His creation. At least, I don't think so. But then, I am of the Chestertonian brand of Catholic. ;-)

Have a great Halloween, and enjoy dressing up!

Kate said...

Ok, my post is up, although somewhat rough. Wander over and let me know what you think!

ef said...

Amanda-

I have been thinking about many similar things recently.

I am drawn to aspects of plain dress.

But partially because I have never really had much of a 'girly side' (exactly) - I simply don't like perfume, or makeup, or shaving, am iffy on jewelry, and have had pretty much no fashion sense since day one.

So, much of it is a relief, rather than a "sacrifice" and yet, I don't dress plain, as most bloggers mean it. But I REALLY love COLOR.


Today I am wearing dyed purple cargo shorts, used brown doc martins (they don't look enough like to doc martins to be fashionable in any sense, I think :) mismatched socks (one grey, one brown) made of organic cotton and darned a few years ago when the toes went out, a bright green co-op t-shirt, and a silly orange old-navy hoodie that purports to be about surfing (I'm a bit old for this trend of having trendy clothes that say a country or activity name that you haven't been to or participated in - a whole new level of clothing as false pretense) - but it was orange, so I "had to have it" (bought used)

I would say I certainly look like a variation on the stereotypical "nouveau plain" of the past few decades - grubby and not terribly fashionable, and most definately not in costume.


I have found the movement of the "new plain" disturbing and heartening at the same time.

Things I like about it

-concern for environment
-concern for garmet workers
-removing oneself from a sort of fashion addiction
-saving money


Things that worry me

-genderedness of it all
-"modesty" - skirts the edges of(or jumps right in!) male dominance and hierarchy, shame about bodies, shame about sexuality
-the trap of letting it become simply the latest fashion (or costume)

I think that what you said about it being okay to wear rainbow socks if they are "sweat free" is right on. Certainly the call to plainness comes out of something real, but I myself don't believe it's a call to stop playing, to give up joy in beauty of color (and one's own vibrance), it's simply a call to justice and love (which can certainly exist in rainbow socks - speaking of which, I recently finished knitting myself some, they're wonderful!)

I also think that anything that keeps you from grinning at people on the subway should be called up for immediate evaluation. We all could use more grins in our lives!


Peace

Pam

Lorcan said...

"Well, did you ever think that maybe a life of monasticism and plainness is not for you?"

Oh Jeff... thee should blog thy self so that I don't have to reply through Amanda... WHEN where we Quakers about monasticism???????? Plain is not monkish.We enter the world in our plain clothes to remind folks of this and that, and to remind ourselves as well... Nor is living plain without fun, even frivolity, God gave us a frivolous nature to cast of the comber of taking ourselves too serriously. There is so much to be serrious about. We have work to do to save this planet. This witness of ours is part of that work, but it is not the work.
We don't dress this way to set ourselves appart from the world, but to enter the world more fully, not to make us serious, but to witness to the wrongs of slavery to fashion, slave labor in far away lands that make our clothes, the lie of fashion, the lie of war,

well, In the book Except For Thee and Me, by Jessamyn West, the husband has put off his plain dress to help a passinger on the Underground Railroad, his wife feels uncomfortable that he feels fancy and well dressed... she says

"This is what thee needs, It looks fine, But seeing thee in it, I can't put out of my mind how much our great grandfathers suffered for the right to put on such clothes and dress plain. And here we go back to what they suffered to be sut of."

( her husband replies...

"We are goin back to exactly what they believed,"Jess answered sternly. "We're dressing whatever way we figure 'll do the most good. That's what they were doing. Our Great Grandfathers weren't settling on some uniform Quakers wear like an army of soldiers until Kingdom come. They put on plain clothes to save themselves and anybody who cared to join them, from a slavery to fashiuon, It was a kind of peculier garb they chose, but it served the purpose."

Dear Dear Jeff, when thy rament becomes an end in itself, well, when that happens to me, I put that rament aside awhile and rediscover why we put on this peculier garb, and make it new again. There is a wonderful qoute I read yesterday in a book of paintings of Amish folks, one told the artist, "We may dress funny, but we're still human..." Even the Amish dress up for Halloween, and they do it without wringing their hands about the firvolity, "to everything there is a purpose... a time to laugh..." and after a time of crying, the comfort of laughing at the most frivolous notion is one of God's greatest gifts, and some times it takes disapline to laugh and play and be as silly as God made thee to be...
I wrote a song yesterday about Mary Dyer, which quotes her, The Truth is my Authority, not Authority truth... Well, that may be why we have such a gentle faith of advices. The newness and leading of our heart can't be found in slavish obedience even to our plain traditions, but we must be led in our hearts to that witness, and not as a comber.
Oh... kiddo... if thee can't dress up with Amanda that day ( and frankly, I'd love to see thee as Patrick to Amanda's Sponge Bob, I'd even contribute to Plowshares to see that!!! - no kidding!!!!!!) Well, if thee can't see thy way to paint thyself grean and pink and put feathers in your hair one day a year ( at least!) on that day ( as Arthur Berk would say ) that some call Halloween... revel in the freedom of spirit that thy dear and faithfully plain girl can do so in freedom of spirit and joy...
By the way, Genie and I are going to a party on the night of this seventh day, She is wearing a costume, I am not... she is wearing an old Amish plain dress, cape, shawl and wonderful bonnet. Oh brave girl she is!!!
I bought her a few plain dresses which she wears as she feels comfortable and once a year, as a costum for a smile, the joke that we are dressed alike and one of us is in costume.
If God never laughed, would we have skunks? If he meant us all to be ever monkish would we have peacocks? A witness is not a jail, others build enough of those...

A big hug to both of ye, and have fun...
lor

Lorcan said...

PS... Jeff... thee can love klingons as much as Amanda loves being a vampire... here is another costum suggestion... Amanda as a Doowap Vampire, and thee can wear two small read marks on thy neck...

:)

lor

ef said...

Lorcan-

I love what you have to say (and the idea of little red dots on Jeff's neck)

I also remember stories from friends of the kids at their schools who were the "weird" ones (Goths, or Punks) dressing up as "normal" kids for halloween - in polo shirts and jeans (or khakis)

I love the idea!

I am musing on the "plain dress" topic much myself lately. Which is perhaps exactly missing the point. Fixation on clothing, a slave to anti-fashion?

Pam

Lorcan said...

"I am musing on the "plain dress" topic much myself lately. Which is perhaps exactly missing the point. Fixation on clothing, a slave to anti-fashion?"

I don't think so, I think all is a matter of ballance and degree. Plain dress may help thee to find a ballance, as well as a witness. But, thee is right, I think, that one can become slave to it. Plain dress is a witness and a statement, and an endevor. However, to be truely plain in everything is not possible. For example, if thee considers the part of the witness against goods taken in war, prize goods. Well, then one can't wear or use any plastic, as it is mostly oil, rubber also, so one has to hear only leather shoes, wool clothes, but the land we graze the cows and sheep on, was taken by war... so it is a statement not an ideal.

By the way, there is not a thought of critism in my reply to Jeff, he's a weighty and thoughtfull Friend.

lor

Anonymous said...

This Quaker denial of the beauty of colour was pointed out to me thirty-five years ago by John Ruskin as the cause of the decay of the Society. "Your early Friends," he said, "would have carried all before them if they had not been false to that which is obeyed by the whole of the animal creation, the love of colour." Allowing for exaggeration there is much in it, especially if we extend "colour," metaphorically, to cover music, dancing, and the theatre.
—John Wilhelm Graham, 1920

Rob said...

hey you,

I'm up with insomnia worrying about where I'll sleep tomorrow and if I'll like it, and all sorts of other things that won't seem all that important tomorrow morning. 6 homes in 6 months and counting... can you still call them 'homes'? Maybe just 'beds'.

i don't even know where to begin to respond in only that I too share so many of your hesitations and doubts and questions. I'm too tired to be coherent, so I'll just offer my heart.

see you First Day,
Rob

Amanda said...

I didn't mean for this to be an attack on Jeff...his questions were asked in good conscience and worked well on mine. I quoted him only to show the spot in my mind where the wheels started turning.

Jeff has plenty of whimsey in him to go with his wisdom. I don't want to talk about him too much in his absence, since he's on retreat and won't see this, but I do want to say...he's got an amazing and accurate rudder. Jeff is True. His question was a good question. The word monasticism comes from me, and not from him. I have been striving for that very thing myself, for a long time. If it is turning out that all this time I've been trying to make myself into the wrong sort of Saint, it is only honest and loving and plain questions like the one Jeff posed to me that will help me find it out.

I've been accused by more than one person (though not on this blog) of "Going Plain" as just another form of dress up. Most emphatically not. I am always looking for the tools that will help me be as True as I can. If it turns out (and I have in no way said this yet) that traditional Plain is not True for me, it will not mean that my putting on the grey was dress up, or a phase, or in any way a cheat. It will mean that it is a tool that didn't suit my purpose.

I've been reading a lot of William Carlos Williams for work. Though his poetry moves me greatly, there is one selection from his prose that has stuck in my heart:

"Afraid lest he be caught up in a net of words, tripped up, bewildered and so defeated -- thrown aside -- a man hesitates to write down his innermost convictions."

I think I trip myself up often. I speak too much and too soon and too often. Perhaps I commit myself too early, too soon, and too often, as well. I don't know. I try not to. I actually have only a very few commitments, and I hold myself to them with great strictness. Perhaps my sin has been (as usual) in language. Perhaps I have seemed to commit to things when I had no such intention. I've been eldered that "Going Plain" is a commitment, not to be laid aside for convenience's sake.

For me, "Going Plain" is not a commitment, but a tool to help keep me true to a commitment that I hold in my deepest heart..and I know it's ad nauseum by now, but that commitment is to be the most loving and True creature I can be. I did not make a commitment to Plainness. I made a commitment to Love. To God, if we are being brave...

"Credo ut Intellegiam"

Often translated "I believe in order
that I may understand", I prefer to read it with Karen Armstrong:

Credo= "cor do" ="I give my heart"

I commit in order that I may understand.

I give my heart in order that I may understand.

I did not give my heart to Plain Dress.

I gave my heart to God.

But for all that, the point is: Jeff was not meant to be the square, straight-laced villain of this post. He is none of those things. He was, and is, a catalyst. ("One that precipitates a process or event") This is something he does very well, a thing that makes him a poweful ally in my quest to be True to my heart-held convictions, to my deep and fiercely held commitments,, and one of the reasons I am proud and blessed to call him my friend.

Lorcan said...

"But for all that, the point is: Jeff was not meant to be the square, straight-laced villain of this post. "

Exactaly, which I why I ended my post as I did, having seen his sense of humor up close.

Commitment is the word. I know how thee weighs thy leading and leadings, and that thee labors hard to - do things right - in life.

Thee may consider John Maynard's April Fools jokes, irreverant, sometimes disturbing, mixing the pot of our souls...

And... if thee needs more inspiration to be a DooWop Vampire once day this year... muse upon the early Friends whose mode of waking up those around them was to run naked through the town.

(No, this is not a coustum suggestion... )

Happy weekend, and joy at Rob's return...

lor

Anonymous said...

"parts of me that are rotten and putrid and that must be stripped away, pruned, weeded, burned. Choose your illustration."

Sounds like the Lives of Saints to me. :)

I personally struggle with Halloween (Christmas, Easter, Fourth of July, etc.) vs. every day is holy. The gap between my principles and my practice is pretty wide.

Despite getting plainer and plainer in my everyday clothes, I still love to dress up, I still have a box of things "devoted to "this will come in handy for someone's costume, " and now I have kids to help with their costumes.

And I wonder how my kids are going to feel if I finally make the leap, start practicing in tune with my principles, and suddenly there's no more Easter baskets or Halloween costumes or Christmas trees. Can I get a free pass on holidays for the next 15 years, just 'til my kids are grown up and out of the house? I think I'd like that.

Johan Maurer said...

Thee said, "I am always looking for the tools that will help me be as True as I can."

I love this lively post and parade of comments. It makes me blush to see what I wrote yesterday on Alice's post, "Modesty becoming fashionable," which I saw half a year late because someone drew my attention to it. Not that what I wrote was wrong, it was just so ... so ... earnest. Your one sentence made my point perfectly.

Some time ago I wrote something about gospel and blues music having both "heart" and "ass." Well, as far as my blogworld participation goes, I guess one out of two ain't bad.

Johan

Lorcan said...

A few of thy Friends and friends in New York, Genie and I, love the term, Doo Wop Vampire. We ave been pointing to costumes, for example a blue haired waitress in a 1950s roller waitress costume and Genie asks... is that Doo Wop?

SO... when thee feels like it...

IF thee feels like it...

describe for us a Doo Wop Vampire
SVP

Joy and every day a holiday
Lor

PS Thanks for a really joyous Halloween post... :)

Lorcan said...

Oh happy happy happy joyous day, which as our Friend Arthur would say, some call Halloween!!!!
Wishing all silliness and joy
lor

Anonymous said...

I like Halloween too. Jung always thought it was human nature to need to dress up and pretend for a day. It helps let our shadow out to play.

But it dismays me how fundamentalists have tried to turn Halloween into a day of evil. They dredge up sick and twisted myths about the Old Religion, as extracted and carefully recorded by medieval monks as they tortured young women to death. Do they know the evil of which they speak?

Lorcan said...

A really blessed Halloween...

Genie dressed plain, and I dressed, well, as I always do. Genie was wearing a WONDERFUL old Amish bonnet and shawl over her plain dress... and we kept hearing folks say "Look... they're FOR REAL!!! " And some would ask if we were in fact Amish, several asked if we were Quaker, and I would say one of is in costume and the other is not, and asked them to guess ... nine wrong answers two right answers... one police man said that it was he himself who was in costume, and a young Hispanic girl, upon being told that Genie was Catholic, hi-fived her with glee... Well, as with the usual day in a plain witness, it led to several long and dear conversations. One was with a young Jewish couple in front of NYU. The fellow explained that he was called as a Jew to cover his head and often resorted to a baseball hat, in order to not stand out... His friend, a rabbi, dressed in the broad hat and black clothes. On a bus, a Jewish woman told him that he was an embarrassment, that he should come into the 21st century. He told her that she was mistaken that he was Amish, and she beamed and said she was so impressed that his people held on to their traditions, at which point he told her that he was in fact, a rabbi, and that she should be proud of her own traditions.
Well, the last conversation, two fellows who looked rather down and out, and may have been without homes, and had been drinking, and as we came out of a late night grocery, one said, "Hey what is with you guys, are you supposed to be old time folks..." His friend suddenly looked at us with such love and said, "No... I know who these people are... they are Quakers." He took us by the hands and with such warmth said, "Thank you, you people saved my best friend from Death Row, thank you so much, bless you." We wished him God's love and well, it was the perfect cap to the night.
Thyne in the light
lor

Liz Opp said...

On a totally different note, and reflecting the thought and niggle that emerged while reading your original post, Amanda--

I wonder if a clearness committee would help you revisit and/or continue testing your leading about dressing plain.

There is so much in your post, though, and amidst all these comments, it is hard for me to get a sense of how much you truly lament your plain-dress (in which case, you may wish to test the good order of laying it down) and how much you are just having fun, given the time of Halloween.

Blessings,
Liz, The Good Raised Up

Anonymous said...

Thanks for another thoughtful, eloquent entry, Amanda. You really spoke to my condition, as I am undergoing a similar period of questioning with regard to the tools I need to be True to myself, and to God.

Lorcan said...

I've been coming back to this post a lot. What is it to live to further the glory of God. What is it even to live within Love, which I think IS the core, the center of the Quaker faith... and I come back and back to balance. We don't seem, in our tradition and in some definition of healthy, to need to live to deny ourselves, but we must not live only for ourselves. We need to live in our commitments and make them with care and thought and deliberation. But, the whole idea of being present to God in others, and listening to each other in that state of being present, that seems to be so hard for Quakers, and sometimes, for me, dressing plain reminds me to that presence and sometimes announces that readiness to be present to others.

Anonymous said...

Amanda, I really liked your post, too. Wow, 26 comments! :)

I also liked Lorcan's last comment: "we must not live only for ourselves... But, the whole idea of being present to God in others, and listening to each other in that state of being present, that seems to be so hard for Quakers."

I've written a few thoughts about collective Quaker witness over here.

-- Chris M.

Anonymous said...

Amanda, I found your blog quite accidentally, but I loved this post.

I'm a liberal Presbyterian myself, though I've wanted to try attending a Quaker meeting because it also seems like something I could fit into, from the little reading I've done. And while I don't dress plain myself, I do cover my head upon occasion and try for some modicum of modesty.

At this point in time, I don't know much about Friends or what you believe. But I've done reading about various traditions of dressing modestly, and it seems to me that dressing modestly, or plainly, or whatever those of us who walk in whichever religious way we do may feel led to do, is not entirely about giving up who you are. There is, of course, the idea of "dying to self" and becoming who God wants us to be, but there is also the factor that who we are is, at least in part, how God made us.

And so, I think, in denying ourselves to fit a mold of how we think God wants us to be, especially if it makes us lean toward a kind of ascetism, isn't the correct way to go about it either. I'm not saying we should necessarily satisfy every worldly desire that pops into our heads, but I don't think we should deny who we are, either, and if you like Smurfs and colorful underwear...then why not?

You mentioned only living, dressing, and so on in ways that would glorify God, but at the risk of totally missing the point of plainness, I wonder if one might also allow some things into their life that don't necessarily GLORIFY God as long as they don't DETRACT from God--in other words, if you want rainbow socks and can't see any way in which they would hurt your relationship with God or the way others in the world might see you as a Christian-religious-type...then why not? Not carrying this attitude too far is key, but why deny yourself everything that you enjoy, when it was God who made you who you are, the person who enjoys these things, in the first place?

Perhaps I'm out-of-turn with all of this and have an entirely-wrong idea of plainness, in which case, do disregard this whole comment...