I have to thank all of you for your love, warmth and upholding in this time. I am muddling through, with the huge support of my friends. I got all of my health insurance paperwork in, all the while aware of the huge privilege I've been given in having that resource. Though I still feel that there is some "soul-sickness" for me to minister to, I will not turn my nose up at doctors and what they might offer me. If a pill could help place me back on the plane where I can experience things unfiltered by the weaker parts of my neurophysiology, then I'll take it with thanks. I’ve had the feeling that I can’t attend to the deeper parts of my “soul-sickness” until I have some of the symptoms under control.
One of the good things about having "all stripped away"...(worship is dry, prayer is dry, spiritual reading is dry)...is that I find the one well that never goes dry is Love.
Duh. I know, there is a part of me that squirms, too. But it's true. When everything else burns away, I am left with Love. It is the one thing that can reach me, it is the one thing I am still motivated to communicate, it is the one thing that I don’t ever doubt the existence of. When I am fussed about the existence of God with a capital “G” and a personality and a will, and the ability to “love me personally” or whatever, I suddenly realize that if it turned out that there was no God but Love, and even if that Love existed only in our ability to Love one another, things would still come out okay in the balance.
Of course this Love is indefinable, but that worries me, as there are so many lesser and harmful things masquerading around under that august title. There was a time when I thought that "all I needed was love" and then things would come out right, but it turned out, dreadfully, that I had no idea what I meant when I uttered the word. Or, what I meant was not what I needed to make it all come out right. And things most certainly did not come out alright.
Pilate can have his question. These days, I am not so concerned with "what is truth." Nowadays I think maybe I have a better idea myself, but I want to know, from the experience of my (f)Friends..."What is love?"
Kate asked in a comment for more clarification of what I was looking for. I began to write this in a comment but decided to ammend my post.
------------
I don't know if I am looking for a definition of Love - once a friend set me the OED entry for Love, and it was overwhelming. I know there is more than one sort of love, all informed, to some extent or another, by the underlying fountain of Love.
So maybe not a definition, but a discussion.
I want to go father than a pat "God is Love" and far beyond the cliches and cuddly bits of "the world's love. A big theme of my life has been misinterpreting "Love Hurts" and "Love is Hard Work" and "Love Bears all Things". Perhaps, ironically, I've been too much of a puritain about love.
How do you love without counting the cost, without being destroyed? How do you love "a selfish object" unselfishly, without harming your soul? I know so many people who struggle with this in their family, in friends, in dealing with the dysfunctional and harmful, who inspite of their dysfunction, must be loved.
Do you cling on, and sing "As long as he needs me..." and trust that God will give you the strength to go on in the friendship or relationship, that if you do your loving part, God will make up the remainder? That's what I thought at one point. Eventually, I had to let go. And though the fruits have shown me that I made a good choice, my mind often teases me with the question "did I just lose faith?" When I read about how God is "well able to perfect all things concerning us", and I look at the disasterous parts of my life that I managed to leave behind with my last shreds of self-preservation, I wonder if a Saint could have stayed and watched God mend the tatters. Then I think about the way God helps those who help themselves. When I have left destructive friendships and relationships, I didn't feel it was a vote of no-confidence in God's ability to heal...it was because I knew that I myself was in physical, emotional, and/or spiritual danger, and that I did not have the ability to withstand it, and even if God could have helped me, I had not been given the ability to recieve that help.
So anyway. I want to hear what other people have to say about this crucial subject, so I'll go back into some silence. I want us to dig deeply, and get beyond "common knowledge". I am beginning to feel that these questions of Love are the most important ones we can ask. It is our greatest commandment: "Love one another as I have loved you." and some say He loved us right to the Cross. There is that in me that does not feel unfaithful because I was unwilling to be crucified for a "selfish object". And yet, in truth, I myself am a "selfish object". This is weighing on me very, very heavily. Thomas Kelley said "We are not called to die on every cross, nor are we expected to".
But is the cross of love universal? Can you sacrifice yourself, your life, your happiness, and your sanity, to Love? I don't feel that God calls us to love to the point of our own mutilation. To pain, perhaps, but not disfigurment. And how do you know the difference?
This is an exercise I can't escape: Think of the most foul human, historical or living, that you can, and know that in their core, they carry the seed of God in them, and for that seed, MUST be loved, ("love one another or die.") if the world is to be healed. Think of them as a 2 month old baby, smiling for the first time, unblemished, and know that this is the truth about them. And know that you are called to love them unto death. And then, think of the people in your life whose presence and actions harm you deeply.
I do this, and I see the image of my baby sister..(just a few posts below). I would die for her. If every human is as precious as this (and they are), why am I not willing to be "deeply harmed" for someone, let alone dive under a truck for them? Why does it feel wrong to allow myself to be "deeply harmed" by someone for love of them, when it is supposedly the greatest love to "give your life"?
It keeps me up at night.
I should add that at this moment, by the grace of God, I'm not in a position where I need to make this choice. I am surrounded by loving and healthy people. But I have been in that situation, several times in the past, and have never come out feeling right. And I know people right now who are struggling with facets of the same issue. It seems so important.
10 comments:
You don't ask easy questions, do you Amanda?
Here's the very tip of an answer though, and you said it yourself: God is Love.
Or, to answer your question more directly, Love is God.
Not that that helps much, to say that the inexpressible is the ineffable. ;-)
I could say a lot about love , but I don't know if you're looking for a description. Let me ponder further, and I'll try to have an answer by the end of the day.
Kate
btw...very sad that you discovered the hard way that "all you need is love" is inadequate, especially 'love' as the world understands it. You should know that even when we weren't quite sure where you were or what you were doing (having only the substance of rumor to fuel us) Anna, Lillie, and I thought of you often and remembered you in prayer. I wish we could have been there for you.
Well, I thought I was dealing with the "Big Love" of the God order of magnitude. I honestly thought I was being loving in a faithful way - I hadn't read this part of Merton yet: (I seem to post it every 4 months on whatever blog I have)
True happiness is found in unselfish love, a love which increases in proportion as it is shared. There is no end to the sharing of love, and, therefore, the potential happiness of such love is without limit. Infinite sharing is the law of God's inner life. He has made the sharing of ourselves the law of our own being, so that it is in loving others that we best love ourselves. In disinterested activity we best fulfill our own capacities to act and to be...Selfish love often appears to be unselfish, because it is willing to make any concession to the beloved in order to keep him prisoner...
A love, therefore, that is selfless, that honestly seeks the truth, does not make unlimited concession to the beloved. Yet there can never be happiness in compulsion. It is not enough for love to be shared: it must be shared freely. That is to say it must be given, not merely taken. Unselfish love that is poured out upon a selfish object does not bring perfect happiness: not because love requires a return or a reward for loving, but because it rests in the happiness of the beloved. And if the one loved receives love selfishly, the lover is not satisfied. He sees that his love has failed to make the beloved happy. It has not awakened his capacity for unselfish love. . . ."
I'm not sure I'm comfortable discussing it here, but if you want to know more than the rumours (I've often tried not to care what they must have been saying at AMC) you can e-mail me at agareis at gmail dot com
The whole thing has spun my life off into stange and wonderful directions, so while I regret the past with my whole heart, I also have to be grateful for it in a strange way.
Amanda, thanks so much for this post. It is so much my experience also, it's lovely to know that I am not the only one. I completely agree about "love" - I also misunderstood it in a very damaging way as a teenager. But the blessings from having discovered a healthy meaning for it are transforming me.
My answer to "what is love?" is a bit of a mixed bag. A good buddhist friend said to me "a bodhisattva (sp?) is not a doormat", which is probably at the top of my list. I can't find many more words to throw at the question right now, but I like the question very much. And thanks again for a great, true post.
Thank you, Alice...that's just my question...how does a bodhisattva sacrifice all he is meant to sacrifice without being a doormat? That's a much more concice question...
Amanda, you said:
"Do you cling on, and sing "As long as he needs me..." and trust that God will give you the strength to go on in the friendship or relationship, that if you do your loving part, God will make up the remainder? Or do you "let go"?
That depends, dear girl, Believe it or not, the second may be the loving thing. I once put a probationer in jail as an act of love-- several times in fact.
The one I have in mind thanked me for it profusely and later became one of my top volunteer assistants.
That's what people mean when they say, tough love.
I suspect your love is getting tougher.
Amanda,
Please visit my blog to see my response to this. I was going to post it here, but it got too long.
A summary...it is not loving to allow someone to abuse us...in any way...because then we become complicit in their abuse. That said, we are called to love the unloveable, and pour ourselves out to help them acheive holiness and wholeness (synonymous terms, btw).
I've posted the stories of how I learned these two lessons on my blog.
Love,
Kate
I would also point out to the commandment to
Love GOD and neighbor as yourself!
Obviously, GOD wanted us to love HIM, our neighbors and ourselves.
Not being a doormat is a good start, but also discovering our own dignity and freedom as persons, and understanding that we are created in the image and likeness of GOD, and as such have a right to be treated with dignity and respect that our personhood demands, but also really, really, really getting to know ourselves in the light of CHRIST - with our GOD-given strengths and our GOD-given weaknesses, all fall under the category of loving ourselves. Once we have begun this process, we can then love others better, and love GOD more intimately. And esp. we will begin to get an idea of what true personal freedom means.
I find, often psychologican and emotional pain can get in the way to truely discover that and how we are (in existence) because GOD loved us first. To dig through all of this takes time, patience with oneself, understanding of oneself, getting to know oneself, a lot of prayer and very good and loving friends who will affirm us in who we are, and who we are meant to be in the eyes of the LORD, no matter what.
Please forgive me for not disclosing my name or identity - let us just say that I am a praying and caring friend.
Three thoughts:
1. As another commenter has mentioned, being human prohibits me from being eternally loving. I can love, and love well, within a moment, or over a short period of moments that are connected one to another. But I am unlikely able to connect well FOREVER. That is God's job, and my jobs are (A) to receive God's love, as it is expressed by the Divine and by the people in my life who are vehicles of God's love; and (B) to express God's love through me as I am able, in my human condition in the midst of "HUMANity."
2. During Meeting for Worship on First Day, I found myself considering the topic of L/love. I began to sit with the realization--or at least, my personal belief--that on a human scale, we humans can only accomplish "lower-case L" love. We can care for, rightly influence, and nurture another, both over time and for a short little while ("right here, right now").
But I began to wonder, in worship, if "capital L" Love is reserved only for God: the unconditional, perpetual, all-compassionate Love, in which God weeps when I fall short, when I cannot (lower-case L) love "the most foul human"; and God rejoices when I am faithful and come closer to the Living Spirit.
3. A poem I wrote, when I came to understand that rightly ordered love--whether it be an intermittent act of "tough love" or a lifelong sort romantic, committed love--rightly ordered love will help grow me, will help me become more than who I am.
More Than Who I Am
Each time you show your steady faith in me
Each time you invite the Deep Me forth
Each time you tell me you like me
I want to bring more of me to you
and I am stunned into laughter
to find
I am more than who I am!
Each time you appreciate my tenderness
Each time you recall my wit
Each time you encourage my honesty
I want to uncover more of me with you
and I am curiously teased
to find
I am more than who I am!
Each time I approach unexpected enemies with hugs
Each time I realize I wait when I would normally push on
Each time I sense the Deep You emerging
I want to meet you, deeply,
and I am lighted into God's lap
with you and with your steady faith in me
marvelling at the repeat blessing
that you are still here
and, delighted, I find again
I am more than who I am!
Blessings,
Liz, The Good Raised Up
I think I need to back up about two or three steps.
I do hear that your "soul-sickness" has cut you to the quick and is or has been preventing you from tending to the depths of your spirit.
It feels like a lonely, dry place for you to be these days...
I also have a sense that you hunger for deep answers to hugely meaningful questions; that in some ways you are at a loss to put your finger on The Answer, yet you yearn To Know. Perhaps the comments here have helped you; perhaps they only make you shake your head in frustration, saying to yourself inwardly, No, no, that's not what I mean; that's not what I want...
It sounds like you very deeply wish to be able to hear the clear voice of God, the I Am That I Am, to union yourself with God, to be still...
...and know..
...that I Am God.
Blessings,
Liz, The Good Raised Up
Post a Comment